Below are two articles. Please read both and respond to the questions
at the bottom of the
second article.
1. In an Age of Likes, Commonplace
Images Prevail
By James Estrin
PERPIGNAN, France — Photographers
attending the Visa Pour l’Image festival in this small medieval city
stroll through the winding streets, stopping to view carefully crafted news and
documentary images exhibited inside ancient buildings.
In most ways it is not much different from years past. There is still a
nightly projection, in a cloistered graveyard, where the photographers view a
selection of the best images of the year. The prizewinners are applauded by
their colleagues in the crowd who seem oblivious to the tsunami of vernacular
photographs about to wash away everything in its path.
There are well over a billion camera phones being used to photograph
dinners, dogs, cute kids, sunsets and body parts — recording every action as if
it were of equal importance.
It is estimated that 380 billion
images were taken last year, most with a camera phone. Over 380 million photos are uploaded on Facebook every day.
Instagram is growing exponentially and had four billion photos uploaded as of
July 2012.
Almost everyone has a camera and is a photographer.
Just as access to pens and paper hasn’t produced thousands of Shakespeares
or Nabokovs, this explosion of camera phones doesn’t seem to have led to more
Dorothea Langes or Henri Cartier-Bressons. But it has certainly led to many
more images of what people ate at lunch.
And while you may not think that my iPhone photo, above, is worth a second
look (or even a first glance), I can proudly report that between Instagram,
Facebook and Twitter, dozens of people have judged its quality positively by
liking it.
And I’m listening to them.
Because of the iPhone and social media, the very meaning of what photographs
are and how they function has changed radically in the last four years.
A photograph is no longer predominantly a way of keeping a treasured family
memory or even of learning about places or people that we would otherwise not
encounter. It is now mainly a chintzy currency in a social interaction and a
way of gazing even further into one’s navel.
This is a fundamental change that must be having a powerful effect on how
people view the kind of images exhibited this week in Perpignan.
As far as I can see — admittedly from ground level — there are two possible
effects on “serious” photography.
1. The flowering of photographers leads to millions of people who are
thinking more visually and whom we may be able to entice to become an audience
for documentary and photojournalistic images.
2. We are bombarded with so much visual stimuli via the Web and social media
that it becomes almost impossible to rise above the flood of images. And if
everyone likes everything, no one photograph is better than another.
I have no idea which of these situations might happen. Or if there will be a
combination of these effects.
The issue is not whether one chooses to use an iPhone instead of a Leica but
the ideas and vision of the photographer.
The effect of the Web on the photography business is ancient news. Film
versus digital — prehistoric, at least in the accelerated time chamber of
social media and the Web.
Six years ago the core questions we faced were: How do we distribute our
work and make a living in the digital age? Since then, some photographers have
survived, perhaps with fewer assignments and more crowdsourcing, foundation
grants and N.G.O. money.
The proliferation of a commonplace — or vernacular — photography
is a much more profound change. The question is not so much whether this is a
good thing for society (or a bad thing for photographers). It is happening, a
billion times a day, and there is no going back.
The question is: How does the photographic community harness this explosion
of visual energy to expand its audience? This is what needs to be focused on.
2. Shooting for Global Change
Some serious photographers might cringe at being called amateurs. Not Antonio Amendola — he wears the badge proudly.
A lawyer by trade and a photographer by choice, he once organized a workshop in his hometown of Bari, Italy, entitled “On the Seriousness of Amateur Photography.”
“If you study Latin and Greek, you know that the word amateur comes from the word amore,” Mr. Amendola said. “So they are the ones who really love photography. We take the title ‘amateur photography’ very seriously.”
He has harnessed the fervor of socially concerned amateur photographers to create Shoot 4 Change, a nonprofit that uses photography to explore little-covered issues while helping small associations and nongovernmental organizations promote their work.
Shoot 4 Change, made up of idealistic amateurs and some professional photographers, has dug into stories on homelessness, hunger, malnutrition and most recently economic distress and related civil unrest in Italy, the United States and elsewhere.
“There are hundreds of small associations, small groups of people, volunteers, that do really good work and need their stories told,” said Mr. Amendola, 41. “There are stories that want to be told, and stories that need to be told. Must be told.”
Antonio Amendola Peaceful protests by the Indignados in Rome turned violent on Tuesday.
Mr. Amendola started his group shortly after the L’Aquila earthquake in central Italy in 2009. His blog on the earthquake’s victims and photography got the attention of many photographers who wanted to volunteer. It has now morphed into a group with over 700 members throughout Italy and in New York, San Francisco and Argentina. He has also enlisted some professional photographers — including Antonio Politano, Ed Kashi, Rajibul Sheik Islam and Alfons Rodriguez — to join.
Photographers are available — at no charge — for volunteer groups and nonprofits that can’t afford photo coverage of their work. If newspapers, magazines or publishers want to use the images, their payment is split, with 60 percent going to the photographer and 40 percent to Shoot 4 Change, which uses the money to defray expenses and support social projects.
He recently started a project highlighting how economic turmoil has affected job prospects for students, the unemployed and underemployed — a generation that is “losing visibility.” The concept is to get people throughout the world to send in low resolution or pixelated photographs of themselves along with a description of how much money they live on monthly. Shoot 4 Change is setting up a Web site and a Facebook page dedicated to the project, which is called “The Low Resolution Generation.”
He said he wants to keep the organization nonpolitical and totally independent, even from sponsorship or advertising.
Mr. Amendola still works full-time as a lawyer, but he spends an equal amount of time on strengthening Shoot 4 Change and encouraging photographers to help to change the world.
“I use the motto, ‘Shoot local, change global,’” he said.
The two articles above you just read, discuss the new photographer of today. Respond to the following.
The website Shoot4change is up and running. Please go to the website, read thru it. Look at the sections and report back, in the post what the site is offering to all photographers and how could it be useful to you right now, as a new photography or civilian.
According to what you read what is your opinion about how the smart phone, tablets, instagram, etc. . .have changed the photography world for good and for bad?
With the new technology, how do you think photography as a career may be able to reinvent itself and become profitable (be creative)?
